Scoreboard - Mixed Doubles Scoring/Ranking
complete
Dave Rapin
complete
Dave Rapin
Would this also be the case for a 3 player team (for w/e reason)? Just show one less position?
Right now we are grouping on position (1, 2, 3, 4), so position 1 is shots 1 & 2, position 2 is shots 3 & 4, etc.
We could instead group by curler. So if Player A throws 1, 2, 3, Player B throws 4, 5, 6, Player C throws 7, 8, then instead of positions 1, 2, 3, 4 you would just see positions 1 - Player A, 2 - Player B, 3 - Player C.
B
Brian Cassidy
Dave Rapin See attached document on business rules. These are old and may be a bit out of date but I think the Game Stats section is good.
Dave Rapin
Brian Cassidy OK so based on the logic; "A player is deemed to have played the position at which they threw the most rocks.
Assign the higher position if equal rocks at two positions." see the attached before and after screenshots from the recent PointsBet where Team Koe has Martin and Tardi throwing for half of position 2 (9 extra shots each since the game ended after 9 ends). Look good (the one with 3 players)? I think the percentage is using the wrong denominator, stand by.
B
Brian Cassidy
Dave Rapin Correct. A team that plays with 3 players has no second stone.
Dave Rapin
Brian Cassidy OK so those look right? I've checked the math and the rules and they look good to me. Double checked percentages and they are right as well.
B
Brian Cassidy
Dave Rapin If the point totals are right then the percentages are right. All looks good to me.
Dave Rapin
planned
Opening this back up to verify the behaviour in the v2 system now that legacy migration is complete.
Dave Rapin
closed
Categorized as legacy. Will review upon migration to v2.